Recently in DC History Category

The DC Humanities council has a video on doing a house history. They also are hosting workshops.

 

There are a few things I thought of when watching the video. One they mention square and lot numbers. Though the square more than likely never changes over time, the lot number can change. When I was trying to map out addresses for my census project I first started trying to make the Square-lot number a key access point for tracing addresses over time. That didn't work as from the 1880s to 1930s lots would get redeveloped and their lot numbers would change. Just be aware. Second, I also discovered the city directory, is not 100% accurate. There was a family I found in the census and confirmed their residency with the sons' draft cards. But in the city directory for that same time period and the surrounding years, another family was listed for that address.

This is a picture in an alley in DC, but not in Shaw. I have yet to get around to wandering over to College Park to get into Record Group 302 and scan any of the photos of Shaw area alleys. I gave The Help (Mr.InShaw) that task, so it won't get done anytime soon. The photo is circa 1930 something taken of Bellevue Court which is on Square 3040 or 3042. I have no idea where that is. 

Those little shacks, not tool sheds. People would poop there. Good Lord, I love indoor plumbing.

One of the reasons why I'd like to get some Shaw alley pictures is to show a historically accurate slum. Ray "O Sunshine" M went on another one of his entertaining anti-Historic District rants regarding the work stoppage at 9th and Q, which got me thinking. When talking about buildings around here 'historic' sometimes have little to do with actual history.

Yes, indoor plumbing existed in many homes in the 30s, but not all homes. Shaw was referred to as a slum in the 1940s & 50s, based on number of homes lacking indoor plumbing. Oh and the crime, but plumbing played a part too. For several Shaw dwellings, being historically accurate would mean having it be appropriate for poor black laborers and laundresses. Nothing fancy. Possibly overcrowded due to racial covenants and rules.

Historical accuracy also means you should have a poopshack.

The following is a very simplified history, which hopefully will give some understanding of the present. During the Big Bear ABC license kerfuffle there were a few emailers questioning the rationale for ANCs or Advisory Neighborhood Commissions.
ANCs are a product of Home Rule. Prior to Home Rule (via the Home Rule Act of 1973) Congress (the Federal government) ran the city. It wasn't until 1974 that DC residents were able to vote and have some real say in how the city ran. Before Home Rule the mayor and the city council were federally appointed. Neighborhood wise there were citizens (white) and civic (black) associations that appealed to Congress and city government officials for things like neighborhood improvements, traffic, crime and so forth. As far as I can tell civic and citizen association leaders were elected by the association's membership. These groups could only beg or appeal to bodies and officials whom they could neither vote for or vote out of office.
With Home Rule, neighborhoods got something new:

... the Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (ANCs), brought the city administration closer to ordinary voters than any other elective units. The city council created 36 ANCs and 376 smaller single member districts, each representing about two thousand residents. The ANCs were intended to serve as neighborhood mini councils that advised the council on local problems.
--City of Magnificent Intentions: A history of Washington, District of Columbia 2nd edition P.584

and not just during earthquakes.

People move. If you do genealogy you'll find that people move around, which is a pain in the butt locating people. The Help comes from a line of lumberjacks, who ran around the northern  US border following trees, and they had a common last name. So it is a guess which state they were in for any given census. My people in NC, though staying in the same two counties, moved around those counties, a lot. So that comes in mind when people say gentrification moves people out of their homes. Life moves people out of their homes. Americans are movers with fantasies that they are stable.

Most people move. A few stay, but in time they move too. In the arguments over gentrification the one family that has been in the same house for 30 years, but easily forgotten are all the other people on the street who stayed for 1 -5 years and moved. Some a few blocks over, some completely out of the neighborhood. Moving people are a bit of a problem for me with the census project as I look at the city directories, which you can find on-line in Google Books: Boyd's directory of the District of Columbia, 1892 and Boyd's directory of the District of Columbia, 1903. I can't speak to the accuracy of these sources as I don't know how the data was collected, but it's the best source out there, short of hopping in a time machine. In my own house there were one set of people in 1892, then in the 1900 Census 11 people, then in the 1903 directory one person, all with different names. Considering that many people were renters, there really wasn't anything tying them to one house, thus freeing them to move

As far as I can tell this church no longer exists. Well in Washington DC. Not anymore.
The reason why I'm typing this up is because someone. I can't say who. Annoyingly has a lot of personal chaff included in federal records. Some of that chaff, provides glimpses of a life partially lived at Rhode Island and North Capitol streets. The person in question was white, college educated, married and is currently very dead. He was the head, for a number of years of a Federal agency. He resided in various parts of Alexandria during the 40s and 50s. And he went to church in Edgewood? Eckington?
His church home was the Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Atonement. I can tell because of other chaff and detritus left behind, such as church programs, pledge statement, and Lutheran publications.
What does this stuff, which personally we should really throw out our own light and gas bills at least 5 years after they've been paid, tell me about a ELCotA parishioner? Apparently you didn't have to live near the church. You could just drive in from Alexandria, worship in DC and I guess go to the office. Because seriously, how does this stuff wind up in your working files?
Anyway, commuting church goers aren't new and we still deal with them to this day. I just hope none are not the head of a government agency and have a habit of stuffing church crap in their office files.

If I ever, ever, which looks like not at all on my current path, write a history of urban renewal from the neighborhood perspective in Washington, DC I will have to include the District of Columbia Redevelopment Agency (RLA). According to the US Government Organization Manual the RLA was:

Created by act of Aug 2, 1946 (60 Stat. 790), to provide for replanning, rebuilding, and rehabilitation of slum and blighted areas in the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act of Dec 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 774), established the agency as an instrumentality of the District of Columbia government, effective July 1, 1974

A post war agency to deal with slums turned into something that helped with the destruction of SW. Which who knows, may have needed destroying in parts, but not to the extent it did with the SW Urban renewal in the 50s and 60s.

First, BACA Saturday, 1st & P @ 10AM. See more here. I won't be joining this cleanup as tomorrow is run around town looking for something and dropping stuff off day. My main goal is to get sample sizes of various Benjamin Moore paint colors (used to be able to get them at Monarch Paints but no more) and get rid of an old pre-HD TV.

Unrelated- history. Everyso often I think of papers I would write if I were really inspired to write and had the time to write. One topic I'd like to spend some more time on is the topic of urban renewal looking at some long term things. For one I'd look at the gensis of DC urban renewal by NCPC and DC government and any non-government players and get a sense of what their motivations were. Then try to figure out what happened to those individuals as they dropped out of the process when plans changed, and plans do change. Second, changing plans. The experts and planners start off with one set of plans and then due to budget, staff, political pressure, the odd riot, or whathaveyou the plans change. The big freeway that is currently I-395 does not continue up New Jersey Avenue and on to U Street. And the big thing is I'd want such a paper for people to look up the primary sources for themselves. I don't want people to automatically take my word as gospel. I have biases, and some of them I will publicly admit to, others I won't. Some will look at the same information and draw different conclusions, but the main thing is that they look and think.